1. This book, or short story, is about
three people that end up in hell. These people are two women, Estelle and Inez,
and Garcin the male. These three people suspect of each other to be the
torturer that will make them suffer but truly none of them are. As the story
passes we realize that they are living hell for each other because they hate
everything about each other. It seems they can not agree with anything and they
just want to kill and get rid of each other.
2 I feel that the theme of the play is kind of like karma.
In the end you will end up receiving what you really deserve. These people where
making others suffer in the real world so it is their time to suffer in hell is
it not? Living an eternity with everything you hate about yourself and others
must suck. However when you make it as so for yourself then you really can not
change it.
3. The tone is depressing and at the same time
philosophical. There is a lot of anger and sadness thrown around in this story
but the characters also do a lot of self studying to understand what exactly
they are in hell for and why they ended up with the two people they did. The
depressing part of "...being a coward." and not being able to live
that way is sad and at the same time it took him a lot of philosophical
thinking about himself.
4. Simile : "Oh just look at her face, all scarlet like
a tomato."
" And presently we shall be naked, as new born
babies"
Repetition: When Garcin keeps saying over and over and
asking if he is a coward. Towards the end of the play.
Imagery: "A man's drowning, choking, sinking by inches,
till only his eyes are just above water."
Rhetorical question: "And what use do you suppose I
have for one? Do you know who I was?"
Anaphora: "No, I wasn't joking. No mirrors, I notice.
No windows. "
Characterization:
1. Direct
Characterization
Garcin tells
us exactly the kind of person he is, he is a wife beater "I'm here because
I treated my wife abominably." Inez doesn't hold back either and calls
herself “a damned bitch." They really have no shame in stating exactly who
they are.
2. Indirect
characterization
You can tell this
play was written in a different time because no one speaks like this
"What’s the point of play-acting, trying to throw dust in each other's
eyes? We're all tarred with the same brush." People will just telling you
"Stop bull$hittng me and tell me why you are really here in hell?" As
far as the syntax, this is a play and the entire play consists of non-stop
dialogue. Syntax does not change as you change from character to character but
diction obviously changes because people have different things to say. Inez
will bluntly tell it as she sees it. When she was scribing herself to the others,
she called herself a bitch. She saw through everyone's b.s. that they had
committed crimes and weren't here by accident.
3. There is no real protagonist. All three characters in this one act are equally important in the play. I think they are static characters because they don't really change by the end of the story. The whole purpose of being placed in that room is not to learn a lesson but to suffer from one's mistakes. Not one of the three characters repented or regretted what they had done. They merely talked about committing the crime and even then it was like pulling teeth trying to get Estelle to admit to what she had done. They don't change, they merely wish they had been placed with other people.
3. There is no real protagonist. All three characters in this one act are equally important in the play. I think they are static characters because they don't really change by the end of the story. The whole purpose of being placed in that room is not to learn a lesson but to suffer from one's mistakes. Not one of the three characters repented or regretted what they had done. They merely talked about committing the crime and even then it was like pulling teeth trying to get Estelle to admit to what she had done. They don't change, they merely wish they had been placed with other people.