Wednesday, January 2, 2013

What's In This For Me?

I would like to improve my communication skills. I know what I am thinking and I have all the right ideas I just don't know how to get it across properly.

Being as English is my second language I have a lot of trouble expressing myself properly. Especially while writing on certain topics in essays. In order for me to be able to write an acceptable paper I usually have to first write all my ideas in Spanish and then translate. Which in the process causes me many headaches and it still comes out wrong because there are certain expressions used in one language that do not really exist in the other. 

My goal this semester is to be able to write a paper without having to go through a worthless draft. To be able to write my pre write and then just edit it for my final. The reason I have so much trouble is because my thoughts are not very organized because I am more focused on the write spelling and correct grammar. Being in an advanced course for a person's second language is not easy! Being as the language I use at home is completely different and it has just always been a challenge. Anyways this semester I am determined to work hard and improve! I am sure this course will help a lot since I have notice progress already! (SAT scores!) hehe 

Happy New Year to everyone! The only way to get your resolutions done... is to not be lazy! Know the only way you will accomplish your work will be putting in the hard work! ^^

Sunday, December 9, 2012

Lit Anal #5 No Exit

1. This book, or short story, is about three people that end up in hell. These people are two women, Estelle and Inez, and Garcin the male. These three people suspect of each other to be the torturer that will make them suffer but truly none of them are. As the story passes we realize that they are living hell for each other because they hate everything about each other. It seems they can not agree with anything and they just want to kill and get rid of each other. 
2 I feel that the theme of the play is kind of like karma. In the end you will end up receiving what you really deserve. These people where making others suffer in the real world so it is their time to suffer in hell is it not? Living an eternity with everything you hate about yourself and others must suck. However when you make it as so for yourself then you really can not change it.
3. The tone is depressing and at the same time philosophical. There is a lot of anger and sadness thrown around in this story but the characters also do a lot of self studying to understand what exactly they are in hell for and why they ended up with the two people they did. The depressing part of "...being a coward." and not being able to live that way is sad and at the same time it took him a lot of philosophical thinking about himself.
4. Simile : "Oh just look at her face, all scarlet like a tomato."
   
 " And presently we shall be naked, as new born babies"

Repetition:  When Garcin keeps saying over and over and asking if he is a coward. Towards the end of the play.

Imagery: "A man's drowning, choking, sinking by inches, till only his eyes are just above water."

Rhetorical question: "And what use do you suppose I have for one? Do you know who I was?"

Anaphora: "No, I wasn't joking. No mirrors, I notice. No windows. "


Characterization:
1. Direct Characterization
 Garcin tells us exactly the kind of person he is, he is a wife beater "I'm here because I treated my wife abominably." Inez doesn't hold back either and calls herself “a damned bitch." They really have no shame in stating exactly who they are.

2. Indirect characterization

You can tell this play was written in a different time because no one speaks like this "What’s the point of play-acting, trying to throw dust in each other's eyes? We're all tarred with the same brush." People will just telling you "Stop bull$hittng me and tell me why you are really here in hell?" As far as the syntax, this is a play and the entire play consists of non-stop dialogue. Syntax does not change as you change from character to character but diction obviously changes because people have different things to say. Inez will bluntly tell it as she sees it. When she was scribing herself to the others, she called herself a bitch. She saw through everyone's b.s. that they had committed crimes and weren't here by accident.
3. There is no real protagonist. All three characters in this one act are equally important in the play. I think they are static characters because they don't really change by the end of the story. The whole purpose of being placed in that room is not to learn a lesson but to suffer from one's mistakes. Not one of the three characters repented or regretted what they had done. They merely talked about committing the crime and even then it was like pulling teeth trying to get Estelle to admit to what she had done. They don't change, they merely wish they had been placed with other people.
 4. I really do feel that I actually met the characters of this play because they had really realistic characteristics about themselves. They were not some kind of magic powered fairy that could do miracles but real people. The people that sometimes we know are in our life and they have every trait that we hate about ourselves and therefor we hate them. I did feel many emotions like annoyance when I was reading this play. Overall a great read and a very interesting way  of thinking about life.



Thursday, November 29, 2012

Thinking Outside the Box

Plato and Sartre

To be totally honest I am not a philosophical thinker to further examen these allegories. English and philosophical thinking in general have never really been my thing. However I think both allegories did an amazing job at extended metaphors that really gets one to think the current world we live in.

For sure I know an Inez, an Estelle, and a Garcin in my life, or at least those with similar personalities. I know what it is like to see something no one else sees and being laughed at as well. Through different characters and ideas that you would never expect you see a lot of the story taking place as if you were living it.Or even if you have not been in that situation once you understand the meaning of an allegory you can really imagine it as if it was happening in the twenty first century.

Anyways I feel both allegories really made me do a reflection on life. What it is worth and how much it means. What there really is to live for and how sometimes we waste our life away being ignorant. I feel both allegories really carried that message and really could bring out the best and worst of lies in true reflecting metaphors.

Sunday, November 25, 2012

Literature Anlysis


 To Kill a Mockingbird  By: Harper Lee

GENERAL

1.To Kill a Mockingbird is a story about a girl named Scout and her story about how her brother Jem broke his arm. To explain how he broke his arm she takes us back to help us understand how it all started.  Scout's family lives in Alabama during the great depression and eventually both Scout and Jem become friends with a boy named Dill who is always interested in the spooky Radley house at the end of the street.  Eventually Dill has to leave and the year goes on, but Jem and Scout start finding what they believe to be gifts in a tree in the Radley's yard. When Dill returns the next summer he is still infatuated with the Radley house. On his last night, the children decided to sneak onto the property to get a closer look at the house.  They are shot at by Nathan Radley and while trying to escape Jem loses his pants.  When he goes back the pants are fixed and folded for him. Jem and Scout continue to find gifts in the tree until Nathan Radley plugs it up. Scout’s father Atticus defends Tom Robinson (a black man) on trial and even though the man is innocent, he is still convicted because of the racist community. He is later shot to death while trying to escape.  Bob Ewell (the man who with his daughter convicted Robinson) is furious at Atticus and vows to get revenge. He attacks Jem and Scout on their way home from a Halloween party and breaks Jem’s arm. Boo Radley steps in and saves the children and kills Bob Ewell.  Scout finally felt as though she can see Boo Radley as an actual person and believes once again in human goodness.  Boo Radley was the man leaving the presents.


2. I believe that the theme of the novel is Human Goodness. The book goes against all of the stereotypes that were in place during the great depression and shows that there is good in everyone no matter what their color of skin is or how different they are. It really emphasizes to not judge the book by its cover especially in times where everyone else seems to be doing it that way.

3.The author’s tone is innocent. It’s told in a way that could only be done through the eyes of a child. 
 "I think there's just one kind of folks. Folks."
 “Neighbors bring food with death and flowers with sickness and little things in between. Boo was our neighbor. He gave us two soap dolls, a broken watch and chain, a pair of good-luck pennies, and our lives. But neighbors give in return. We never put back into the tree what we took out of it: we had given him nothing, and it made me sad.”
 (Talking to Jem about Dill) “Yeah. Don’t say anything about it yet, but we’re gonna get married as soon as we’re big enough. He asked me last summer.”

4. Symbols: The Mocking bird was the biggest one and represented innocence. Therefore to kill a mocking bird is to kill innocence. 
 “Mockingbirds don't do one thing but make music for us to enjoy... but sing their hearts out for us. That's why it's a sin to kill a mockingbird."
Imagery: The imagery that Lee uses throughout the book paints a vivid picture in your head about how Scout sees the people in her life.
 “It was times like these when I thought my father, who hated guns and had never been to any wars, was the bravest man who ever lived."
Setting: The setting itself explains a lot. A small town in the south during the great depression is the only place where a story like this could take place.
 “Maycomb was an old town, but it was a tired old town when I first knew it. In rainy weather the streets turned to red slop; grass grew on the sidewalks, the courthouse sagged in the square.”
 “The one place where a man ought to get a square deal is in a courtroom, be he any color of the rainbow, but people have a way of carrying their resentments right into a jury box. As you grow older, you'll see white men cheat black men every day of your life, but let me tell you something and don't you forget it - whenever a white man does that to a black man, no matter who he is, how rich he is, or how fine a family he comes from, that white man is trash.”

CHARACTERIZATION

1. "The main one is, if I didn't I couldn't hold my head up in town, I couldn't 
represent this county in the legislature, I couldn't even tell you or Jem not to do
something again." (75) Atticus 
This is an example of indirect characterization to Atticus and how he can’t stand up for himself and is somewhat of a coward.
"Atticus was feeble: he was nearly fifty." (89) Narration 
This explains to us that Atticus is an older man and therefor we get a sort of picture as to what he looks like.

2. Being as the narration is being told in a "child's" point of view it is not very dynamic. The narrator keeps that ideas on the people pretty innocent and simple. The emotions are all very blunt because of the fact that it is supposed to be a child's narration.

3.Jem who is one of the main characters is a dynamic character in To Kill A Mockingbird because he changes throughout the book. For example, at the beginning of the book, Scout and Jem are best of friends. In the first summer that Dill came they played together every day. Later, in the middle of the book, Jem starts to mature and stray from Scout. Scout describes the way he acted towards her, “Jem was twelve. He was difficult to live with, inconsistent, moody,” (Lee 115). She goes on to say she cannot understand why he has changed so much. He starts to impose rules on her and tells her to be more of a woman. Scout thought about how just a month ago they were having fun and wrestling like two boys. Later Jem changes again, but this time he starts to become best friends with Scout again. For instance, Scout gets laughed at when she messes up the play, but Jem comforts her and tells her it is okay (227). For these reasons, Jem is a dynamic character.

4. I just felt that I had read a character in the end of the book. Not that it is a bad thing or anything I just kind of felt the emotions half way. Usually when the narrator is a more philosophical person or more mature that is  when I actually feel like I met the person. However since this story was told in a childs perspective I just felt the innocence the whole time and no real connection. True there was some very mature scenes in the book but I feel if the narration would have been different then my whole outlook on the story would have changed. 

Blog Views.

WOW OVER 1,000. I know that is not that many compared to others but wow am I happy! At the same time it is kind of a motivation to put my best thinking into the information that is going on my blog. If people are actually looking at my work then I should probably make it good material right?! WAH! So excited! haha(:

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Allegory of the Cave Sonnet


In the cave they live lost in the shadows,
Torn from reality to live in chains
And the dim fire from behind them glows
By looking they break loose and feel the pains

An enlightenment he will then receive
Blinded by the light he cowers in fear
Realizing all his life he's been deceived
No more distortion it all becomes clear

He wishes to share the knowledge he gained
But the others ridicule his knowledge
Until people see the light all is stained
Without truth their lives stay over the edge

The freedom the people fear yet long for
Showing in life we should all strive for more

Sunday, November 18, 2012

Plato's Allegory of the Cave


1.Allegory of the cave represents that the “reality” we believed in can the something that we create in our own imagination. We must free ourselves and getting out of the cave and coming to see real things with our own eyes. It can be “painful” to destroy all we believed before and establish the new thinking.  However, like the prisoner who suffers from the bright light when he first get out the cave. Eventually, he will get used to the light/brightness and be thankful to whoever brought him out of the “dark” cave and enter the world with “light”.

2.Prison house(cave)—world of imagination
Prisoner---people who is ignorant/innocent.
Shadow/Darkness—imagination/false realities
Sun/Light---intellectual world and reality
The prisoner who walked out the cave ---Philosophers

3. Plato believes that education is the process of learning spiritual knowledge;
and that everyone is given the power to learn within their soul. However, the process of enlightenment can be different from people to people. Education should a spiritual enlightenment. Plato suggests about the ideal world; it that there is equality among people. And all the knowledge/truth should be known by every citizen. As a philosopher, they have the responsibility go into the dark cave and enlighten the ignorant prisoners who still live under the shadow.

4.The “cave” represents the world of illusion/imagination. The prisoners who are impounded in the world with limit vision. The “reality” they believe is based on their imagination. The “shackles” are the restriction that confined the people who lives in the cave to walk out. I think it represents fear of the unknowing world with light. If they can’t break the shackles, they will ever have the chance to explores the outside world.

5.In society today , I think the suspicion/distrust shackle people’s mind. People can’t trust each others because they are afraid of close friends/family’s betrayal. Personally, it is hard for to trust some random people I meet online. You don’t like if they are telling the truth or lying for some purposes. The suspicion tends to restrict the free flow of information and knowledge. In addition, the egotism can be a shackle for people’s mind.

6. The perspective that the prisoners have is none because all those shadows are allusions that truly distort all reality of shape and size from objects. The freed prisoner has a far greater understanding of perspective because he actually gets to see the objects from nearby and judge as to their actual size and attributes from close. never seen it.

7. The prisoners were restricted to only the views of what the shadows presented therefore lack of clarity and confusion can occur at the same time when one refuses to look beyond what is before them essentially...lack of clarity and intellectual confusion occurs when people are either hidebound or stupid or a combination of both.

8.Cave prisoners get free when they are released into the real world. This in a way releases them to be intellectually free. It really demonstrated the prisoners getting to know reality. They feel that all the images they see and the shadows they have live by are reality and really and truly they know nothing. Not even light because they have never seen it. The beginning stage of seeing the light I think is the beginning stage to their intellectual freedom.

9. There is definitely a difference between appearances and reality. If you translate that to the modern day I think as a teenager we can compare it to the way girls act and the way they look. They might pack on makeup and make themselves look completely beautiful but sometimes they are the meanest people you will ever meet. There are always different worlds people would like to live in and I feel that because of this conclusion it is safe to say that reality and appearance can be very confusing and misleading but they are two different things that definitely exist.

10.  Assuming that Socrates's assumption that there is a difference between reality and appearance, two metaphysical assumptions that can be made is that reality is self-deceptive and therefore reality does not exist because of the discriminatory ideals between each persons reality.